The Gestapo cared what works of philosophy you were reading. So did the Stasi. Those of you who live in free countries may find it a bit hard to understand why any populace wouldn't tear to bits any bureaucrats that would take away the fundamental right to read whatever you like without it being used to determine how your government treats you as you cross borders or travel within your own country.
Every country tells its citizens, and the world at large, that it is a "free country". The USSR had a constitution with a bill of rights much like that of the USA. Just as in the USA, those rights were not enforced and not enforceable.
The United States is not a free country. Only when the DHS is dissolved, disbanded, disempowered, and disrespected will there be any prayer of freedom.
Those of you in free countries may like to read the book that DHS found so interesting, or meet the Rutgers professor of philosophy, Douglas Husak who wrote it. You may even want to carry a small, useful keychain flashlight advocating for "Freedom of Thought". Freedom of thought needs more advocates.
Freedom Boxes. Eben Moglen created the Freedom Box Foundation to create and spread tiny, cheap home servers that use free software to provide freedom and privacy for individuals. These compete with "cloud-based" services that put your privacy and your freedom under the control of third parties who don't have your interest at heart. These boxes are designed to make mass surveillance impractical and thus to safeguard political liberty (even in countries that don't favor individual liberty). See the video or transcript of Eben's speech on "Why Political Liberty Depends on Software Freedom More Then Ever". I'm helping.
A Shade Structure for Burning Man. I built a pretty simple shade structure for our camp at the Burning Man festival.
Freedom of Movement / Secret Law. I sued TSA to make them stop demanding that citizens identify themselves in order to travel. Not only airports, but trains, cruise ships, and some buses, are now "asking for" IDs. You can't read the rules -- they define your rights and obligations, but they're super secret information (SSI). I petitioned the US Supreme Court to examine whether the Feds can enforce secret regulations. I lost every one of these lawsuits. The Constitution is a dead letter as far as the one-branch Federal dictatorship is concerned. Whatever the Executive does, Congress and the courts rubber-stamp. What we did discover is that there is no requirement to show ID to get on an airplane. TSA said so in their papers and in open court. But each of these courts refused to make TSA stop lying to the public with airport signs telling every passenger that their ID is "required".
If you politely decline to show ID whenever someone asks (or demands) it, and continue politely declining regardless of how they escalate, you will discover what your rights are. You'll be surprised. You'll get away with it. Most of the people who were asking for it have no right to demand it. They've been relying on your voluntary cooperation. They forgot to tell you that part; but you just found it out for yourself. Sometimes you may discover that you didn't have the right to live, move around, or do business in your own country without government-issued documents. That's very interesting knowledge to acquire first-hand too. If you haven't recently tried exercising your right to exist and live without government permission, are you sure you still have that right?
Deflating Idiocy About Security. The US government says we are always at an "Elevated" threat level. They have no plans to ever reduce this reported threat level down to "Low", no matter how many years of untroubled life we go through. It's like the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists' "doomsday clock" which in over fifty years has never been shown with less than 17 minutes remaining before Armageddon. Well, 17 minutes have ticked past more than a million and a half times since 1947, and the bombs haven't blown us up. These are both scare tactics, not real reflections of reality.
In reality, the likelihood of you being directly affected by a terrorist attack has not gone up or down since 9/11; the likelihood has always been extremely low. You and your friends are far more likely to die in bed, in a car wreck, of heart disease, or by falling down the stairs, than from a terrorist attack. Similarly, the risk of you or your friends being directly affected by an atomic explosion is also low -- perhaps at 10AM rather than at 7-minutes-to-midnight. More...
Disarming the rogue United States. The United States should be forced by United Nations resolutions to surrender its "weapons of mass destruction" or face the consequences. "That nation has gone beyond the pale. It repeatedly threatens and attacks other sovereign countries without provocation, holds massive stocks of nuclear and conventional weapons, tortures its own citizens and those of other countries, refuses to follow its own constitution and laws, breaks international treaties which it co-created and signed, holds 500,000 political prisoners in its jails. It imprisons the largest number and percentage of its people in the world. Every government with that kind of track record needs to immediately disarm and submit to a regime change, or face the consequences from the international community."
What's Wrong with Copy Protection? Why should self-interested companies be permitted to shift the balance of fundamental liberties, risking free expression, free markets, scientific progress, consumer rights, societal stability, and the end of physical and informational want? Because somebody might be able to steal a song? That seems a rather flimsy excuse. This early paper on DRM (Digital Rights Management) systems is still relevant in spots.
I've scanned in some Cygnus marketing materials showing some of the early evolution of the free software market.
GNU Radio can receive and decode over-the-air HDTV signals in the US standard "ATSC" format. This decoder enables researchers to demonstrate a full software implementation of the ATSC format, and also provides a reference implementation for other designers. The decoder software currently (May 2003) runs about 40x slower than realtime, but enables the realtime recording, slow decoding, and later full-speed playback of HDTV signals. I have verified that the software works, on my own equipment. Here are example images #1 and #2 decoded on May 13, 2003 from KQED-DT, channel 30 in San Francisco, California.
In 2008 I catalyzed Kestrel Signal Processing's donation of the OpenBTS cellphone base-station software to the Free Software Foundation as part of GNU Radio. In 2009 I wrote and contributed smqueue, an SMS text message queueing and delivery module, to that part of GNU Radio.
I knew Rob Savoye from Cygnus, and knew he'd done some work on an embedded Flash player, so I asked if I could pay him for six months to turn that open source embedded Flash player into a GNU flash player. He agreed, and the Gnash project was born. It currently provides a standalone player which builds and runs on a variety of systems, using OpenGL and other renderers, plus a browser plugin. The project is now financially supported by a commercial company, Lulu.com, which stands to benefit from its rapid evolution. It is now able to play Flash videos from YouTube and Lulu.tv. Stay tuned; a solid community of contributors are improving it daily.
In the early days of computing, almost all software was free. IBM's operating systems, for example, came with source code and the right to copy and modify it. This gradually changed as software became more independent from hardware. Richard Stallman realized the loss to the industry from the change, and formalized the issue with the GNU General Public License and his project to re-implement Unix freely in 1983.
I ported Richard's GNU Emacs to the Sun Workstation that year. I started archiving the free software posted to the Usenet in 1981, and continued through 1987 or so. I started a project to "sift the sands of Berkeley Unix", collaborating with UCB and other Unix hackers to sort the nuggets of original, nonproprietary code out from the background of AT&T-licensed code. Ultimately this resulted in the Berkeley "Networking 2" release, which didn't require the recipient to have an AT&T license. In 1985 I wrote the "pdtar" program, which eventually became GNU Tar. In 1986 I tested pre-releases and each public release of the GNU C Compiler (now called the GNU Compiler Collection). I wrote GNU UUCP and hacked on the GNU Debugger and GNU Make in 1988 and 89. I ported most of Berkeley Unix through GCC in 1989 for UC Berkeley, so they could abandon the proprietary AT&T C compiler, as part of the effort to make BSD Unix freely available. In 1989 I co-founded Cygnus Support, the first company dedicated to supporting free software. Cygnus has made major contributions to free software, including better documentation, quality assurance, cross-compilation, many ports to new hardware and operating systems, and marketing help to get free software accepted by the computing mainstream. While at Cygnus I maintained the GNU Debugger (GDB) from 1990 through 1993. I worked on MIT's free Kerberos software for Cygnus from 1994 through 1995. I served on the Program Committee for the First Conference on Freely Redistributable Software in February 1996. Throughout 1996 I worked on securing the Berkeley Internet Name Daemon ("BIND"), the free software which holds the Internet together by mapping domain names to and from numeric Internet addresses, using Domain Name System Security ("dnssec").
From 1996-2003 I co-created and sponsored FreeS/WAN, which added IPSEC (cryptographic security and privacy) to Linux's Internet networking support. In 2001 I co-created and sponsored GNU Radio, a framework for digital signal processing of radio-frequency signals. In 2005 I co-founded GNU Gnash with Rob Savoye (who is doing all the work). In 2007, Don Hopkins and I convinced Electronic Arts to release Will Wright's original groundbreaking SimCity game (which started the billion-dollar Maxis/EA "Sim" series of games), released for free to the children of the world under the GNU General Public License (v3) as "Micropolis" (its original code-name). I also helped the One Laptop Per Child project with quality assurance, writing and editing, tech support, and other collaboration. In 2009 I wrote smqueue, a queueing and delivery system for SIP-based text messaging, which processes SMS messages for cellphones handled by OpenBTS GSM cellphone base-station software (which is part of GNU Radio). I still contribute occasional changes to various free software program.
In 2006 I sued the government to demand that it either publish the secret law that requires citizens to show ID in order to travel in the United States -- or to stop enforcing that secret law. This is part of my Freedom to Travel case. The FOIA does not apply to this secret law, because Congress specifically exempted airline security directives from the FOIA. Congress could not exempt them from the Constitution, which requires that citizens be given notice of what the law requires -- but the courts did exempt them from it, by refusing my case every step of the way.
The US government is deathly afraid of its own citizens (and non-US-citizens) having access to good encryption. This fear extends all the way up to the Vice President and the head of the FBI, who personally get involved in creating encryption policy. Everyone in government refuses to tell us why, saying it's classified and the national security is at stake. Rubbish! The security of the nation is already gone when its government violates the basic rights of its own citizenry, as these agencies do every day. They are "burning the Constitution in order to save it". (My own belief is that what's really at stake is a wiretap-based power base that J. Edgar Hoover and the classified spy agencies have built up for their own benefit.)
The most Byzantine set of laws, regulations, policies, departments, and practices you've ever heard of are employed by the National Security Agency and three or four other Executive Branch departments in an attempt to keep good crypto from bad guys. Unfortunately, they have also succeeded in keeping good crypto from good guys who have constitutional rights. I instigated a lawsuit to correct this, with Dan Bernstein as plaintiff and the Electronic Frontier Foundation backing him up. I was a technical advisor to the lawyers in the case. On December 6, 1996, Judge Patel decided that the export regulations are unconstitutional. The government appealed, and on May 6, 1999, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with her. The government appealed to an 11-judge panel in the 9th Circuit (an "en banc review"), which was granted, and then the government "voluntarily" changed the encryption export regulations so that most free software and academic research, and a lot of proprietary encryption software as well, can be easily published from the US. The "en banc review" of the old regulations became moot, and the case has been handed back down to Judge Patel, who ultimately ended it. The new regulations are even more complex than the old ones, and carry the same old harsh penalties for inadvertent violation. They need to not just be "reformed" but scrapped.
The government claims to retain the right to change those rules whenever it wants, and restrict encryption software again if it chooses. Congressman Judd Gregg announced support for doing so in the week of hysterical reaction after the World Trade Center was destroyed by hijacked airliners, but was shouted down by the people who'd spent a decade fighting this battle before he could gather any political support.
I have had an interest in encryption since childhood, and have spent a lot of time working on crypto export control issues.
I led the team that built the world's first publicly announced DES Cracker, a machine that finds the secret key used to encrypt messages in the government's favorite encryption scheme, the Data Encryption Standard (DES). The National Security Agency intervened when the scheme was being standardized in the early 1970s, shortening the secret keys so that they could build their own DES Crackers. But they spent the next 25 years lying to us about how secure the scheme is, to encourage everyone to use it -- and we did. This left NSA able to secretly eavesdrop on anyone who used DES, which includes the entire financial community, and most computer and network security systems. Technology has advanced to where anyone with $200,000 can break the code, leaving all of our DES-protected infrastructures at risk. Thanks NSA! By 2010 much of the older DES-based software has been replaced, though there are a few places that still use it, and its use is still an option in some protocol implementations even though it is known to be insecure. NIST has standardized a new algorithm with much longer keys, which has not been studied nearly as long as DES, but which has resisted all attacks so far. Smart people long ago stopped designing DES into new systems. Triple-DES or AES seem to be the preferred replacements.
The US policy on "illegal drugs" has been a terrible, hurtful sham for my entire life. Today there are more than 2,300,000 people in prison in the United States -- supposedly the freest country in the world. One quarter of the world prison population is imprisoned in the US. We have imprisoned a larger number AND a larger percentage of our citizens than in every single other country. Minorities are imprisoned at large multiples of their actual incidence of criminal behavior.
458,000 of those people were in prison for non-violent mind-altering drug charges in 2000; about 500,000 in 2008. (The federal Bureau of Justice Statistics reported 155,900 in city or county jails for drug offenses (2002); 251,400 in state prisons (2008); and 95,205 in federal prison (2009) - more than half of all federal prisoners.) Many of these political prisoners are otherwise law-abiding people, making families and pulling their weight in society. The vast majority of them are black or Hispanic. Don't forget the additional 582,759 nonviolent drug users on probation and the 261,666 on parole in 2009.) The policy that locks all of them up, and makes their drug-using friends fear their own government, is wicked and racist. It damages our citizens' respect for the law, it encourages corruption in our government institutions, it has been responsible for major losses of our constitutional rights, and has wasted hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars. It has also cost millions of people their time and money to fight the criminal justice system. It encourages violent resolution of commercial disputes with drug sellers, by denying recourse to courts, harming not only those people but their families, neighborhoods, and innocent bystanders. The US has forced this policy down the throats of countries all over the Earth, vastly multiplying the misery and injustice it creates. And it artificially raises the prices of these substances, feeding our citizens' money to many violent and irresponsible suppliers. At least 68 million people have used illegal drugs (as of 1996), including our own Presidents, but the madness persists. The obvious lies that the government tells in furthering its drug policy make every thinking citizen doubt other statements -- even true ones -- from such an obviously corrupt government.
Besides the practical issues, there are fundamental rights involved. The right to speak freely is irrelevant if the citizenry does not have the right to think freely. Our government's control of drugs is really intended to control our citizens' mental states. The substances themselves are not important unless they affect human minds (and some, such as nitrous oxide, are freely sold for non-mind-altering uses, but controlled when people wish to influence their own mental states).
These drugs appear to be prohibited by the government because they permit users to see that the world is not composed of a single point of view, a single concrete reality shared by all. The way each of us interacts with the world is a function of our internal brain chemistry, which is unique to each of us, and can be altered by our own choice or by imposed choices. The government seeks to impose its answer to the choice of whether or not to view reality in certain ways. These altered ways have clearly been useful in religion, art, music, medicine, and recreation for millennia. These government attempts to control the minds of its citizens are a direct violation of the basic constitutional freedoms that the government is designed to secure for ourselves and our posterity.
I have known many people throughout my life who are able to use drugs in appropriate settings without harm to themselves or to others. I have known a few who were unable to control their use, and abused drugs. Today's policy does not "cure" these drug abusers, nor successfully remove them from society. The huge number of harmless users swept up in the gears of "justice" swamp the system, preventing the real troublesome people from being reformed or isolated.
Just as adults keep immature children away from matches and hot objects, though there is no law prohibiting the possession of matches by children, parents and social feedback should be used to teach children how to handle drugs responsibly. The War on Drugs has certainly not kept children from being able to get drugs! By eliminating the black market and the threat of prison, and allowing straightforward talk from people who know the dangers first-hand, children can learn the real reasons why some drugs are best avoided, and learn the line between use and abuse of other drugs. Today's situation teaches children that it's best to sneak and lie about what they're doing -- both because they are afraid of prosecution, and because they see drug-using parents doing the same thing.
I believe that mind-altering drugs should be usable and sellable under the same rules and the same taxes that apply to substances like flour, sugar and coffee. If the label says it's pure Humboldt County marijuana of 18% THC content, then it had better really contain that, or the seller is in legal trouble. Otherwise, no restrictions, no special taxes, no more black markets. If someone consumes a drug in a way that damages people around them (or seriously threatens to), they should be held responsible -- whether the drug is coffee, alcohol, or cocaine.
No matter who you are, you know someone who uses illegal drugs. Talk with these people about the real effects and the real dangers of the drugs they use, compare what they tell you to what the government tells you, and ask them about how the current drug laws and policies affect their life. If you think you don't know any drug users, think again of who you know. Are you really sure about all of them? If you still can't think of anyone, ask your friends in private whether they have ever used illegal drugs. You'll be surprised at what some of them have been afraid to tell you. Learn from what they know, but learn especially from the paranoia and fear they have had to live in. Then work with me for a peaceful end to the Drug War and a sane policy for how to treat our fellow citizens.
I helped around the edges with introductions, strategy, specs, testing, Secure Digital hardware, and little bits of programming. In particular, I made sure that the hardware would handle SDHC cards (larger than 2GB), and worked on understanding and clearing the software roadblocks that kept the project from reducing the power consumption of the hardware. I also got the original SimCity game released for the OLPC as "Micropolis".
In its original form, it meant that the Usenet software (which moves messages around in discussion newsgroups) was resistant to censorship because, if a node drops certain messages because it doesn't like their subject, the messages find their way past that node anyway by some other route. This is also a reference to the packet-routing protocols that the Internet uses to direct packets around any broken wires or fiber connections or routers. (They don't redirect around selective censorship, but they do recover if an entire node is shut down to censor it.)
The meaning of the phrase has grown through the years. Internet users have proven it time after time, by personally and publicly replicating information that is threatened with destruction or censorship. If you now consider the Net to be not only the wires and machines, but the people and their social structures who use the machines, it is more true than ever.
Books are more frequently updated by their readers this way than software, because books arrive with their "source code" -- the text -- visible to and correctable by the reader. A short note back to the author suffices. The Whole Earth Catalog was regularly improved this way.
Any country that makes every citizen a felon is heading for real trouble. We need to reform the legislative system that keeps producing too many of the wrong laws. I first said this in a speech to the First Conference on Computers, Freedom, and Privacy in 1991.
I believe that within fifty years we will stand shamed, in our own opinion and in world opinion, for this travesty of justice and civil rights. We will offer recompense to our citizens unjustly deprived of their liberties due to this spasm of paranoia. Whether we can ever repair the Bill of Rights, or restore public trust in honest government, is a much harder problem.
I made this remark in an email message on 2/26/1993 to the PEM-DEV@TIS.COM mailing list, complaining that I couldn't use the PEM encryption software because the fascists who ran the naming hierarchy wouldn't give me the name I chose. I wanted a name like "O=gnu(_at_)cygnus(_dot_)com". The main objection to this sort of "easy and obvious" name is, (the quote above). That is, when the X.500 hierarchy takes over the world, "bad" names like that one won't work any more. I switched to using PGP, which didn't impose any craziness on the names people could use.
I have some system administration insights that I've learned from administering my own and my companies' machines.
The National Transportation Safety Board investigates all airplane accidents, from the most mundane to the largest crashes. They have not investigated any of the events of 9/11. Search here for all crashes between September 1, 2001 and September 30, 2001. Virtually all of them have had their "Probable Cause" released after investigation, with a full report. Read a few reports; see the detail of their investigations. Then look at the reports for the 9/11 crashes, which say nothing but:
NTSB Identification: DCA01MA065 Scheduled 14 CFR Part 121: Air Carrier operation of United Airlines Accident occurred Tuesday, September 11, 2001 in Shanksville, PA Aircraft: Boeing 757, registration: N591UA Injuries: 44 Fatal. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 are under the jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The Safety Board provided requested technical assistance to the FBI, and this material generated by the NTSB is under the control of the FBI. The Safety Board does not plan to issue a report or open a public docket.Call their Public Affairs office at +1 202 314 6100. Demand to know why they're stonewalling the public on the most important airplane crashes of the decade. They've published basic Flight Data Recorder analyses, logs of radio transmissions, and radar analyses at their FOIA site, but no analysis of the crash remains, nor about why the planes hit the ground -- in particular Flight 93. You can also get about 100 hours of MP3 audio recordings of 9/11/2001 radio traffic from NORAD at the Government Attic.Org web site.
See also the
Pictures from the Iraq war that the US
tried to censor so that Americans could not see them.
More Deflating Idiocy About Security
[I finally see some other people pointing out the low likelihood of terrorism affecting you. Try Sam Hughes on How to fight terrorism.]
Your chance of having bad things happen to you as a result of "security" measures taken by your government is definitely on the rise. The U.S. Government has killed at least ten times as many innocent people in anti-terrorist wars after 9/11/01 than were killed by terrorist activity on and since 9/11/01. If you are an innocent person living in Afghanistan or Iraq, you are far more likely to die from the intentional act of a US Government soldier than you are to be killed by any other terrorists.
Many US citizens have spent time in jail because extra "anti-terrorism" searches found illegal things (that had nothing to do with terrorism). Thousands of immigrants have been imprisoned without cause, and thousands more have been deported for trivial non-safety-related crimes like overstaying a visa. (Many thousands more have left even though they were here legally, figuring out that they did not want to live in a society like what the U.S. has become.) Our former corrupt Attorney-General decided that every prosecutor and every judge should impose maximum sentences for every detected crime. Our latest corrupt Attorney-General nominee was the architect of the US torture in Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib that violated international law and every norm of civilized conduct. These actions have nothing to do with making us safer, and everything to do with building detailed control over people. A public that's constantly herded into fearfulness is far more likely to give away the blessings of liberty that we "ordained and established" a federal government to protect for us.
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals came to a similar conclusion in Bourgeois v. Peters, in which it found "Given that we have been on 'yellow alert' for over two and a half years now, we cannot consider this a particularly exceptional condition that warrants curtailment of constitutional rights. We cannot simply suspend or restrict civil liberties until the War on Terror is over, because the War on Terror is unlikely ever to be truly over. September 11, 2001, already a day of immeasurable tragedy, cannot be the day liberty perished in this country. Furthermore, a system that gave the federal government the power to determine the range of constitutionally permissible searches simply by raising or lowering the nation's threat advisory system would allow the restrictions of the Fourth Amendment to be circumvented too easily. Consequently, the 'elevated' alert status does not aid [a government attack on civil rights]."
Comments on Emergency Re-Sentencing of Ecstacy. There is no need for an "emergency" change to the sentencing provisions for Ecstacy; democracy requires full public participation. Congress did not mandate an increase in penalties; it mandated a review of penalties to make them appropriate. The penalties for use or sale of MDMA should be decreased, not increased. The discovery, manufacturing and distribution of MDMA has provided positive benefits to millions of citizens. Sentencing guidelines penalizing MDMA use are an unconstitutional regulation of the freedom of thought that underlies many cherished freedoms, and should be eliminated. The re-sentencing of MDMA is part of a misguided attempt to "lock up the truth" -- or at least to lock up the truth-tellers -- about MDMA.
Securing Internet traffic against wiretapping. Given the current rampage of Federal cops, it is even more important that honest citizens and businesses protect themselves from wiretapping, by deploying good encryption both in your own systems, and for communication with anyone else. If we can secure 5% of the traffic this year, we can secure 20% next year; and 80% two years out. The whole Internet will have been secured. Want to help?
Verio censored my email, and ultimately cut off my net access, under anti-spam pressure. I am not a spammer, and have never sent any spam. But Verio blocked outgoing email from my machine. I was not able to send person-to-person email to my friends, my colleagues at EFF, or anyone else. I think this is wrong. Any measure for stopping spam should have as its first goal "Allow and assist every non-spam message to reach its recipients." I found a new provider, United Layer, who is not trying to censor me. I encourage everyone to boycott Verio's Internet service, until they fix both their "Acceptable Use Policy" and their enforcement policies.
Al Queso seeks U.S. school technologies. Terroristas from impoverished lands desparately seek information about US technologies that are used to educate and control U.S. students. Concerned parents should remain cowed but pliant.
If you're a friend and you've tried emailing twice, it's probably one of our mail handling systems. I suggest phoning me. It seems that in the last few years, large numbers of ISPs have started using "blacklists", even the ones that never did before. The blacklisters hate me, so they put me on their lists, even though I have never sent a single spam message. They don't like the way I administer my machine. (I don't like the way they administer their machines either.) It will often be hard to get your ISP to admit that they are censoring your incoming email -- but ask them why you can't get email from IP address 22.214.171.124 (new.toad.com). They will tell you that that address must be a scurrilous spammer because it's on the blacklist. But you will know better.
Don't just let them put in an exception for mail from me. Get them to take off the blacklist on your incoming mail. It is usually hard -- but worth it. Who else's emails are you missing? Some of us figured out in the 1950s that blacklists were a bad idea.