vol2 - Page 7
Page 7
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
UNZTED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
:: Drug Enforcement Administr'ation
In The Matter Of )
i::': ) _ocket Mo_ 86_22
_ARIJUANA RESCHEDULING PETITION )
OPINION AND RECOM_NDED RULING, F_NDINGS OF
_.:i_ FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DtC_SION OF
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
TO
i_ INTRODUCTION
This is a rulemaklng pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.Co
§ 551, e=_seq., to determine whether the marijuana plant (Cannabis sativa L)
(-
_ considered as a whole may lawfully be transferred from Schedule I tq Schedule 11
.of the schedules established by the Controlled Substances Act (the Act), 21
U.S.C. § 801, e.___ se_? None of the parties is seeking to "legalize" mar_j, uax_.
(
generally or for recreational purposes. Placement in Schedule II would meen,
essentially, that physlc_ans in the Un_ed States _,ould not violate Federal law
by prescrlblngmarljuana for their patients for legltimate therapeutic purposes.
It is contrary to Federal la_ for physicians to do this as long as marijuana
_emalns In Sch,_le. r_ :2
11_Is proceeding had its orlglns on May 18, 1972 when the Natlonal Organi-
zatlon for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) and two other groups submitted
petltlon to the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD) I, predecessor
<__ I The powers _nd authority granted by the Act to _:he Attorney Genera] were
delegated to the Director of BNDD and subsequenl:_y to the Administrator of
DEA. 28 C.F.R. § O.lO0, e_ _e_.
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index