vol2 - Page 423
Page 423
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
...... I opportunity for individual patient control by
- 2 permitting the patient to regulate and maintain the
3 high. '_
4 Where is the conclusion that marijuana was
5 superior in your study?
6 A Again, quantifiably. The quantifiable
7 amount, I'm going to repeat myself, the quantifiable
8 aspects of it there is no evidence. Our observation,
....... 9 our capacity to see and make sense of what we see
10 indicated to us that the smoked group might be
11 preferable and don_t forget that I'm reporting to you
12 we only had a few patients. We continued these
13 protocols at the Farber Center for years. We didn:t
14 stop with this study we continued _o wO_kr, fOr a long
15 long time. We ended up with hundreds of patients.
16 We're going over a study of 22 patients. If I were to
17 _ tell you how many patients I saw who smoked marijuana
18 after this study they werein the many dozens.
19 Q But you chose not to write about that?
20 JUDGE YOUNG: I think you've covered the
21 point of this article. The article will speak for
22 itself. Let's move along.
23 BY MS. SHIRLEY:
24 Q Now doctor in paragraph 7 you go on to state
25 that "Schedule 1 status of marijuana was the nearest
NEAL R. GRO55
1323 _HGD_ ISLA_ AVE_U_o N.W
(2_Y_) 234-_ W_HIMGTOM. D.C. 2_05 _202) 232_00
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index