vol2 - Page 389

 o
 9. 130
 I
 system of the body would conce_vab!y be somewhere on
 2 the same order of magnitudes
 3
 Okay_ On page 10 cf your affidavit, the
 4
 bottom paragraph, youmention self-tltratlon by
 5
 smoking. _uld that be an advantage to a patient, to
 _6 be able to self_tltrate the dose?
 7
 Well, the only titration that they can do
 8
 would be by using one of. the what we are calling a
 .9
 side effect of marijuana utillz.stlon, as the point of
 _0
 reaching an eq_itmble dose level, being able to judge
 ........ II
 one has an equitable dose level in the systemic
 12 circulatlon.
 13
 _ _ Wouldn't self-titratlon also allow someone
 I4 to take enough of the marijuana until they lost their
 15 halos or their vision was less blurred, and so they
 16 knew they were getting a medical dose that was
 I? sufficient without taking too much?
 E_ See, I'm not -- _ heard that referred to
 !9 this mornlng_ and _m not aware of any study where
 o 20 theze have been dellneations o_ both objective and
 21
 subJectlve criteria, the presence of halos, the
 22 blurriness of vlulon as was described this morning.
 23
 _m not aware of any studies wi_ere those subjective
 24
 feelings-have been related to the objective criteria
 . 25 of visual acuity, whlch again I correct when i
 HEAL R_ G_OS,S
 COURT _|PO_T|R$ _ND T_ANSCR_$