vol2 - Page 378

 9_119
 I
 Yeah, _hat was wlth oral thosgh_ wasn't it?
 That was THC again, Delta_9_
 3
 Yeah_ bet that was oral THC. It was not
 4
 inhaled
 5
 _ght
 6 A Right
 7
 And in Perez=Reyes and Walls and Davis in
 S 1976, it showed an. average drop of 20 percent with
 9 Delta=9 and Delta-8 T_C?
 10 _ After intravenous Del°_a 9, yes.
 II
 Intravenous, that' s r:Lght.
 12 And Hepler and Frank and Petrus, this is
 13 Rxhlblt ? of yours, a 1976 study, found a similar
 [
 14 reaction?
 15 _ On a one=tlme basis _Ln the patient. That
 16
 was on glaucoma patlentso
 ....... 17 _ Right. Hepler and Frank and Petrus
 18 concluded in their study that _.t has been shown that
 ]9 maEijuana smoking induces a substantial decrease in
 20 intraocular pressure in nozm&.l young males. The.
 21 magnitude of this effect is _reater than would be
 22
 expected to occur utilizing currently accepted
 23 medications. _ And then they use myotlcs, epinephrine
 24
 anl cazbonlc --
 25
 E Anhydrase °
 NEAL Ro GRO5,$