vol2 - Page 195
Page 195
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
....... 53. AS a scientistt I wondered why THC had been selected
in the first place as an anti-emetic drug. There was no
scientific evidence to suggest the government had ever con-
ducted a thorough survey of marijuana chemicalm§ much less
conducted a survey which indicated THC was the most effective
anti-emetic chemical in the marijuana plants
54. In the absence of this kind of careful prior
investigations it appears THC was simply something on a shelf
that the government had available for basic drug abuse research
studies show THC is marijuana's most psycho-active chemical.
There are no studies to suggest THC is _arijuana's most
effective anti-emetic chemical.
55° THC was not marijuana. I[ felt the arbitary
selection of synthetic T_C was politically motivated and a
gross distortion of an appropriate scientific approach to the
treatment of patientsa
56° ! was also deeply concerned that_ even in those
limited instances where marijuana smoking was permitted, the
conditions under which patients had to smoke were essentially
hostile.
57. The conditions were rigid; smoking times were
prescribed .-- patients were not allowed to self titrate their
dose and were forced to smoke marijuana too quickly _- and they
could only smoke marijuana in a locked room.
58. These restrictions seemed senseless to me. The vast
majority of patients who were already using marijuana were
! ...............
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index