vol1 - Page 348
Page 348
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
Georgia_ Michigan_ New Ľork_ Tennessee and California
overwhelmingly confirm ChangSs conclusion that marijuana is
.....
highly effective as an antiemetico
c. _he/37_ Sallan/Zinb_q__tu_
-DEA appears to disregard the valuable 'observations on
marijuanaes effectiveness as an antiemetic made by the
Sallan/Zinberg study based on the fact that it nwas not a
scientific comparative study of smoked marijuana and oral
THC # "ii_/
Neither the researchers who conducted the study nor the
medical com_unityshare DEAns unreasonable position. Dro Norman
Zinberg, co-author of this study_ testified that it is through
these kinds of observations that medical utility is
established. II_/ And, this is exactly what occurred with the
observations made in the study. As the Alliance demonstrated in
its briefs physicians regarded them as w_luab!e in determining
their acceptance of marijuana as an antiemetic and shared the
information with their own cancer patients. I_Q/
d. 1984 Double_Blind Study Comparing
_C to MariluaDa
Xn its briefs DEA refers to a double-blind study
purporting to demonstrate that THe is more effective than
ilS/ DEA Brief at 29-33.
llgJ Cross-examination of Dr. Norman Zinberg_ Tr. ii_204.
12_q/ ACT Brief at 47_
42 -
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index