vol1 - Page 338
Page 338
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
I. Adequate Research, Including Double _
Blind Studies_ Has Proven That Marijuana
is Efficacious as an Antiemetic and in Some
Cases Is More Effectiv_t__han Other Antiemetics.
Sufficient and adequate research has been conducted to
demonstrate marijuana_s antiemetic properties. These studies
are thoroughly discussed in the Alliance's initial brief. 9-_/ DEA
attempts to discredit this evidence by characterizing the
research as primarily #loose and uncontrolledo mS/ DEA also
argues that there are no double-blind studies showing marijuana
to be more effective than any other antiemetic. 9-1/ These
contentions are inaccurate and are discussed briefly, iD__%.
a. State Studies
DEA fails to comprehend the importance of the state
studies in determining marijuanaes accep_=ed medical use in
treatment as an antiemetic. DEA limits its discussion to trivial
points on the implementation of these programs relating to
#efficacy _ testing. What DEA fails to notice, however, is that
these state programs were not intended to obtain NDA approval but
rather ta provide critically ill patients with legal, medically
supervised access to marijuana for use in treatment of their
emesls,
9__/ ACT Brief at 44-91.
9__/ DEA Brief at 29.
9// !Ao
9__/ ACT Brief at III.
_..i. _<9__-.
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index