vol1 - Page 332
Page 332
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
in toxic_ even lethal reactions when
properly _ployed_
By contrast _ o o there are no medical
studies which [show_ marijuana damages major
organ systems or [causes]6_qutef injurious
biological consequences° _s
While DEA focuses on phantom fears, the record unmistakably
affi_marijuana's therapeutic benefits can be safely exploited
_ithin a medically supervised setting. _/ Many of DEASs own
witnesses are uneasy with the Agency's phobic assessment of
Xsafety._
Keith Green, PhoD° on re-direct testified that the side
effects of marijuana are no worse than those caused by
dronabinol, a Schedule II drug:
Shirley: [13s there any difference in the
side effects between the oral [THC] and the
smoked [marijuana]?
Green: NoR [Y]ou get exactly the sam&
responses_ 6--_/ ". .
FDA agrees. In its March 9_ 1982 Federal Register notice on THC_
FDA states:
The effects of pure THC are essentially
similar to those of Cannabis containing THC
in similar amounts .... The risks to the
..... public health from [the] use of THC are
likely to _similar to those of
marijuana _i
___/ Affidavit of Dr. Andrew Wei!, _ 42_44. ___ also ACT
Brief at 17-27o
__Z/ ACT Brief at 17-27. Marijuanaes safety for use in the
context of cancer therapies, _. at i16-_3_ glaucoma therapies,
//_o at 162=66; as an antispasmodics i d. at 213_26.
6_/ Re-direct of Keith Greene Ph.D. _ Tr. 9-195.
__9_/ 47 _edera! Re_iste_ I0082_83, (1982).
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index