vol1 - Page 279
Page 279
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
accepted scientific criteria for dete_ining
utility _ . . I resigned my posi_9_ to
protest the co_ittee' s actions ° _i
In such a charged atmosphere perhaps the best measure
of how members of the ophthalmic community feel about
marijuanaSs use in the treatment of glaucoma can only be gained
by secret ballot. Fortunately_ the California Research Advisory
Panel (sCRAP m) conducted an informal, n3n_public poll of
ophthalmologists. A_ stated in their 1984 Report to the
Legislature, CRAP _ound:
Treatment of glaucoma with Cannabis was the
subject of an Ophthalmology G_rand Rounds at
the University of California, San Francisco°
A questionnaire was distributed which 0
gueried the ophthalmologists on cannabis
therapy for glaucoma patients refractory to
standard treatment. Many of the
opthalmologist have glaucoma patients who
have asked about marijuana° Z__q_t respondents
• ele__t. , _smoked mar_._uana need[sl
_o be available for patients _ho h v ot
benefited _sianificantly from __
_x_a/_n_a. _ 23 a!
c. Judicial and Political Acceptance
..... _
of Marijuana in the Treatment of
G_iaugo_a
On at least one occasions a court has accepted
...... marijuana°s use in the treatment of glad,coma and has ruled that,
in some instances_ access to marijuana for the treatment of
_2_/ _. at I 63.
9__-_/ ACT Official State Reports_ Vol 1 _ Exhibit 5. Fourteenth
Annual Report of the Research Advisory Panel_ 1983. Prepared
.... _ for the Governor and Legislature Research Advisory Panel_
San Francisco_ 1984 at Ii.
206 -
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index