vol1 - Page 259
Page 259
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
Shirley: What would you base that
determination on at this point?
Merritt: The fact that hess young, hers
pigmented_ all of thes_ings are aggravated
by standard therapies. _;
This Court should not abandon the _traditional n
standard of assessment for determining °hhe utility of IOP-
lowering drugs in favor of the untested, poorly defined standard
advanced by the Government,
-%
Based on what Dr. Spaeth calls the #traditional #
standards [supra] therefore_ marijuana more than satisfies all
current NDA criteria required for approval for the specific
indication of intraocular antihypertensiVeo
In his direct testimony_ Dr. Spaeth asserts:
D_gs which are to be seriously considered
for [the control of glaucoma] should not have
permanently damaging effects on its
users. _
Death is a permanently damaging effects yet all
currently accepted glaucoma control drugs are capable of
provoking a lethal responses even when properly usedr under a
physicianes supervision.
As established above_ all currently accepted glaucoma
control dlnlgs are capable of producing very significant,
permanently damaging sublethal adverse effects including
pulmonary difficulties, renal stones, ulcers, fatigue and
7_/ Cross-examination of Dr. John Merritt_ Tr. !0-I05 to i0-!07_
.... _ 7_/ Direct Testimony of Dro George Spaeth_ at ii.
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index