vol1 - Page 160
Page 160
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
the physician°s treatment determinations0, Patients could nots as
in other states, elect the mode of therapy (i_eo., THC, marijuanas
Torecan) nor could they elect to switch their mdoe of therapy_
When the March adjustments were deemed inadequate_ the
Panel further amended its Smoked Marijuana Protocol to include:
l. any cancer patient receivin9 radiation therapy or
any chemotherapy drugs known tc_ cause nausea and
vomiting, and
2o alternative smoking technique to humidify the
smoke and r_e the smoke_s harshness by
_._ filtration_t
By the time the Panel acknowledged these problems,
however_ physicians like Dro Ivan Silverberg, had already
abandoned the California program. 2_-_/ While still tabulated by
' " ' _ such physicians were so alienated
the Panel as Hpartlclpatlng,
by the CRAP program that the Panel's long overdue protocol
amendments did not bring them back. _/
T e 3 oft
In its 1983 Reports the Panel noted _that over 1700
patients had received [oral THC_ or smoked marijuana and the
majority had benefitted substantially in the relief of their
nausea and vomitingo W285/ Furthers the Paneladded that
28%/ Cross-examination of Dr. Ivan Silverberg_ Tr. 3-96.
___/ Affidavit of Dr. Ivan Silverberg_ _ 69 (avast majority of
physicians I know have discontinued any association with the
California State Program").
28_/ ACT Official State Reports, Vol. l, Exhibit 45, Fourteenth
Annual Report of the Research Advisory Panel 1983 to the Govern_
& Legislatures CRAP, San Francisco_ 1983, at.l.
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index