vol1 - Page 120
Page 120
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
were considered highly significant by the researchers I_I/ and in
the view of the medical community as a whole_/_!/ A clearer
indication of the value attached to the Sallan Zinb_rg study is
the simple fact that physicians shared this information with
their own cancer patients. !_/
b. _/__/3/_ Chan_ _S_
The observations made in the Sallan/Zinberg study were
.... confirmed and extended by the Chang study in 1979o This study;
conducted by the National Cancer Institute; sought to determine
the antiemetic utility of synthetic THC pills and smoked
16_I Dro Norman Zinbergg a co-author of the Sallan/Zinberg
study, indicated that this was an impo1_cant observation that
should be reported and that the study should not be limited
specifically to the protocol but should m[encompass] everything
you observed in the course of doing your workF that you don't put
..... on blinders and close your eyes_ if sometlhing else comes up n and
_if you get lost in doing the protocol exactly that way and don_t
pay attention to anythinq else that comes ups you may lose the
most important part of the study. N Cross-examination of Dr.
Norman Zinberg, Tr. 11-203 & !i_201. Further, Dro Zinberg
stressed that these reports were confirmed in dozens of patients
that were observed throughout the continuation of the study. /_d.
at II-205. Most significantly, the accep_ance of the article by
The New England Journal of Medicine for publication indicated
that these medical observations were _wo_:hy of being
distributed_ _ I_o at II_204o
i__/ Dro Ronald Stephens and Dr. Deborah Goldberg testified that
they were #impressed x by Sallan's observations. Affidavit of
Dr. Ronaid Stephens; I 4; Affidavit of Deborah Goldberg; _ 24°
Dr_ Daniel Dansak regarded these observations as valuable in
determining the medical acceptance of marijuana as an antiemetic
i_ and in reference to the authors of these observations and other
anecdotal reports affirmed that nthese were investigators who had
enormous credentials in pharmacologic care and one had to pay
attention to things they were saying and you just can't discothnt
because you don't like the drug° _ Cross_examination of Dro
Daniel Dansak, Tr. 11-65 & Ii_74.
21_/ Affidavit of Dr. Ronald Stephens_ _ 9.
47 -
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index