norml23 - Page 74
Page 74
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
Second, it guarantees that when Congress finds it necessary to delegate
authority, it provides the recipient of that authority with criteria
sufficiently specific to guide the exercise of the delegated
discretion. Third, "derivative of the second, the doctrine insures that
courts charged with reviewing the exercise of delegated legislative
discretion wi[[ be able to test that exercise against ascertainable
standards." [d. at 2885-2886°
Justice Marshall, writing for himself and the three other
dissenting justices, wrote a lengthy dissent in which he repeated the
argument he first made in his concurring opinion in FTC v. New England
Power Co., 415 U.& 345, 352-53 (1973) that the nonde[egation doctrine
"is surely as moribund as the substantive due process approach of the
same era _- for which the court if fond of writing an obituary. .if
not more so." Justice Marshall then excoriates the pJurality for
returning to the era of substantive due process and strict
nonde_egation without actua[ty saying so. Evan as he does so, however,
he acknowledges and accepts the principles established by the landmark
administrative law cases of the t970's:
[ do not, of course, suggest that it is appropriate for a
federal court reviewing agency action blindJy 1:o defer to the
agency's finding of fact and determination of policy. Under
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402,
416, 91 S.Ct. 814, 823, 28 LEd. Zd 136 (1971 ), courts must
undertake a "searching and careful" judiciam inquiry into those
factors. Such an inquiry is designed to require the agency to take
a "hard look," Kleppe v. Sierra C_ub, 427 UoS. 3£0, 410, 96 S.Ct.
2718, 2730, 49 L. EdoZd 576 (1976) (citation omitted), by
considering the proper factors and weighing them in a reasonable
manner. There is also room for especially rigorous judicial
scrutiny of agency decisions under a rationale akin to that
offered in United States Vo Carolene Products, Inc., 304 U.S. !44,
152, N.4, 58 S.Ct. 778, 82 LEd. 1234 (1938). See EnvironmentaE
Defense Fund v. RuckeJshaus, 142 UoSo App. D.Co 74, 439 F 2d 584
(197!).
It is simply not possible to read the five opinions, covering some
60 pages in the Supreme Court Reporter, without coming inexorably to
the conclusion that the case law dealing with challenges by criminal
defendants to the CSA has developed in a vacuum. Every single member of
the Supreme Court accepts without question the proposition that strict
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index