norml23 - Page 70
Page 70
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
Imposition of Penalties" 1970 Washington U.L.Q. 2'.65 r 266 (1970). There
the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the defendants for grazing
sheep on forest [ands in violation of regulations adopted by the
Secretary of Agriculture, pursuant to a statute which permitted the
Secretary to regulate the occupancy and use of forest reservations, in
order to preserve them from destruction. Bn reaching its holding, the
court said:
IT]he authority to make administrative rules
is not a delegation of legislative power, nor are
such rules raised from an administrative to a
legislative character because the violation thereof
is punished as a public offense.
,,.a violation of reasonable rules regulating the use
and occupancy of the property is made a crime, not by
the Secretary, but by Congress. The statute, not the
Secretary, fixes the pena[tyo
...the Secretary did not exercise the legislative power
of declaring the penalty fixing the punishment for
grazing sheep without a permit, but the punishment is
imposed by the act itself.
Id. at 521, 523.
This is, the Supreme Court stressed two crucial features of the
statute and the delegation of power which saved Grimaud from
constitutional infirmity: First, the rule-making power granted to the
administrative agency was for the purpose of implementing a vaiid
federal regulatory function; second, the Supreme Court specifically
noted at two different places in its opinion that the Secretary did not
have the power under the statute to fix the penalty for the violation
of such rules as he would adopt. Thus, wherever it turns out that the
purpose of a statute is not primarily regulatory, or, in the
alternative, wherever the federal agency to whom power is delegated may
not only define the eiements of a crime, out also fix the penalty for
its violation, a different result might obtain.
Again, defendant submits that although this a:nalysis subjects the
CSA to a constitutional attack, it is open to the court to engage in
"saving interpretation," and narrowly construe the statute to avoid
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index