norml21 - Page 88
Page 88
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
properly subject to economic regulations_ such as taxation,
import duties, and the like, but not criminal sanctions°
Furthermore_ whether the right to possess marijuana with
whatever intent -- distribution_ personal use, or otherwise -- is
a fundamental right or not is not the issue. The Ninth Amendment
does not protect onl_ '_fundamental '_ rights° It protects all
rights not enumerated in the Constitutionr fundamental or not°
The converging interests and rights affected by 21 U.SoCo
_841(a) (i), justify the application of the very least which the
Ninth Amendment provides -- the use of analogical reasoning to
permit the intent and mandate of the Bill of Rights to apply to
novel situations. The Government may assert that there is no
right of privacy to possess marijuana for a commercial purpose°
The defendant does not base his argument on the right of privacy
for such a purpose° Were this a simple possession and use case,
the right of privacy [already established as a Ninth Amendment
right, Griswold Vo Connecticut_ 31 U.S. 479_ 85 So Ct. 1678r 14
L. Ed.2d 510 (1965)] would clearly be an appropriate vehicle.
However, defendant asserts a broader right -- the right to
possess a relatively harmless substance (in private or otherwise)
regardless of any subjective intent as to what he plans to do
with the substance.
If the substance is as harmless as the medical evidence has
shown marijuana to be, the defendant's intent in possessing it is
88
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index