norml21 - Page 35

Page 35 Previous , Next , Original Image
Return to Index

 right to refuse to carry an unquickened embryo during her early
 months of pregnancy. In doing sos the District Court quoted from
 U_nion Pacific Railroad Co. vo Botsford, 141 U.S. 250, 35 L. Edo
 734 (1891)r a decision which the Supreme Court in R e vo W .de
 followed with favor. The Supreme Court in Unig!! Pacific_, as
 quoted in Babb__kz_ stated:
 No right is more sacred_ or is more carefully
 guarded by the common laws than the right of
 every individual to the possession and
 control of his own person, free from all
 restraint or interference of others, unless
 by clear and unquestionable authority of law.
 As well said Judge Cooley, '_The right to
 one's person may be said to be a right of
 complete immunity: to be let alone°"
 141 UoS. at 251.
 The Court in Babbit_z chose language strikingly similar to
 that used by former Justice Clark, one of the members of the
 Court that decided @ri_wold_ In his essay -- Reli_io____litz
 and Abortion: A Cons_itutional A raisa_ 2 Loy. Lo Rev° 1
 (1969), Clark stated that since !965_ an entire "zone of
 individual privacy" exists around "marriage, home, children and
 day-to-day living habits_" protected by the Ninth _ench_ent in
 the absence of a clearly demomstrable compelling state interest°
 "This is one of the most fundamental concepts that the Founding
 Fathers had in mind when they drafted the Constitution°" 2 Loy.

Previous , Next , Return to Index