norml21 - Page 25
Page 25
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
the Supreme Court in only three decisions: Ashwander v_
Tennessee Valley Au%horit_, 297 U.S_ 288 (1936); __gf/D___seQ
Elec%ric Power Com_p__/!Z v. ToV°A_ 306 UoSo llSq 59 So Ct. 366
(1939); Un___t_d Public Wgrkers v_ll, 330 UoS. 75, 67 S. Ct_
556 (1946) . In the ToVoA° cases of 1936 and 1939s the Supreme
Court rejected allegations by opponents of T.VoA. that by
engaging in production and sale of electrical powerf the federal
government had prevented private individuals from using their
property and earning a livelihoodo The Court found no violation
of the Ninth Amendment as had been urged, stating the Ninth
Amendment does not withdraw rights expressly granted to the
central government°" 287 UoS. at 330.
In United Public Workers v_ M_tchel!_ employees of the
executive branch of the federal government: asserted that citizen
have a fundamental right to engage in political activity and
express their views. Not found to be violative of the Firsts
Ninth and Tenth Amendment were provisions of the Hatch Act which
forbid civil service employees from active participation in
management of political campaigns. In rejecting the employee's
arguments, the Supreme Court accepted their contentions that the
nature of political rights reserved to the people by the Ninth
and Tenth Amendments were involved:
The right claimed as inviolated may be stated
as the right of a citizen to act as a party
official or worker to further his own
25
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index