norml19 - Page 8
Page 8
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
challenged scheduling provisions of the state
controlled substances act make no sense, lacking
any conceivable justification.
The __icus-applicant_s brief will assist
counsel for the existing parties_ and ensure
complete presentation of the difficult issues in
this case, issues in which there is general public
interest° Thuse consideration of the accompanying
brief will enhance this Court's ability to reach
the most just result.
8, CONCLUSION
WHEREFORE, the amicus applicant NORML asks
the Court to grant permissions for the filing of
the enclosed amicus brief. The plaintiff-appellee
and other amicus parties consent to this motion.
NO_ML is advised that the appellant State of
Washington (by its Attorney General) has neither
objected nor consented to amicus motions filed by
the other _micus parties. NORML waives oral
argument°
The applicant NORML regrets the delay in
filing these materials, unfortunately resulting
from: The need to coordinate with the other
6
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index