norml17 - Page 24
Page 24
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
because of the AIDS epiderrfic° Those of us with diseases receiving less
publicity than AIDS may be the only ones able to see the proverbial silver
fining.
A theoretical method of getet_g the law changed is through a voter
initiative. That is virtually impossible to en_sion in reality, because of the
huge amount of time and energy required, and the physical debilitations
suffered by the people who care about the issue most.
Finally, if none of those approaches succeed, the law is probably
vulnerable to a well-thought-out attack on state constitutional grounds° The
most straightforward would be the equal protecfion/pfivileges-and-hrLmunities
analysis presented above beginning on page 22, primarily because there
would be tittle risk in having the case dismissed for tack of briefing on the
factors, Justice Utter having provided the entire analysis in his
concurring opinion in Ste_.Srrfith. 90 Another attack could be mounted
invoking the "frequent recurrence to fundamental pfinciples" of Section 32,
applying it both to the inhumane withholding of medication for no legitimate
state purpose, and to the bizarre legal position people are left in under
DianA.
Both of the above could theoretically be mounted without being
arrested and charged, the de_ls (even theoretical) of wbSch are beyond the
purview (or deadline possibiIifies) of thSs paper. Suffice to say, there is a law
on the books stating that marijuana will be provided. 91 On the other hand, if a
person were convicted and sentenced, a successful attack could probably
void the law as being creel purfishment under article 1, § 14o
The issue of federal supremacy remains, also beyond the purview of
this paper. HoweveL in a practical sense, just as the federal government
doesn't investigate and prosecute possession of marijuana in personal-use
amounts, so they could be counted on to ignore persons using it
therapeutically.
This is clearly a law that needs to be changed, and if no other avenue is
available, a court challenge, properly researched and invoking the protection
90 _ note 71o
91 _up, r_, nora 14.
24
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index