norml10 - Page 2
Page 2
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
,_r0-_-_?-7007 Ai:_ _ 26,9! 1;2:50 I4o.005 p.fi2
]RUG F'OLICY FOUNDAT!OI'4 TEL:_'_ -"
2
Petition for Review of Orders of the
Drug Enforcement Administration
Thomas C Collier, Jr, wR.h whom Sleven IK. Davidson
and A_r_v t._( LL_tig were on the brief, for petitioner Alli-
ance for Cannabis Therapeutics in 90-1019.
Kevin B. Zeese was on the brief for petitioner The
National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws
in 90-1020.
Charlotte d. Mapes, Attorney, Department of Justice,
with whom Margaret A. Grove, Attorney, Department of
Justice_ and Stephen E. Stone, Associate Chief Counsel,
Department of Justice, were on the briei% for respondent
in 90-t019 and 90-1020. Madelir,'_z R° Shirhgv, Attorney,
Department of Justice, also entered an appearance for
respondent.
Before: StLBERMAN, BUCRLE% and HgNDERSON, Circuit
guc]_wso
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SmBEaMAN.
S_LBE_MA_ Circuit Judge: This is a petition for review
of a final order of the Administrator of the Drug Enforce-
ment Administration (DEA). The order maintains the
classification of marijuana as a narcotic drug under Sched-
ule t of the Controlled Substances Act, 2t U.S.C, 801-996o
Petitioners, Alliance for Cannabis Therapeutics (ACT)
and National Organization fbr the Reform for Marijuana
Laws (NORML}, who claim that marijuana should be
reclassified in Schedule II, argue that the DEA Adminis-
trator's decision rests on an improper application of the
statutory standards and an incorrect determination that_
_)etitioners failed to meet them. We think that the Admin-
istrator's interpretation of the statute was in the main
acceptable, but he appears to have relied on several factors
that are tmreasonable because logically impossible to sat-
isfy; therefore, we remand.
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index