norml04 - Page 1



Page 1 Previous , Next , Original Image
Return to Index


 12 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision belt, re publicatior_ in
 the Federal Reporter or U.$.App. D.C. Report& Users are requested to
 [w]ith one exception, none of [these doctors] could identi- notify the Clerk of any formal errors in order that corrections may be made
 fy under oath the scientific studies they swore they relied before the bound volumes go to press.
 on. Only one had enough knowledge to discuss the
 scientific technicalities involved. Eventually, each one
 admitted he was basing his opinion on anecdotal evi-
 ' ni[e  fNtateg  ;aurt af  ppea[ 
 dence on _tories he heard from patients, and on his
 impressions about the drug. Foa THE DISTR3CT OF COLUMBIA ClRCUFI"
 Final Order, 57 Fed. Reg. at 10,502-03. These findings are
 consistent -with the view that only rigorous scient}fie proof can
 satis_" the CSA's "currently accepted medical use" require- Argued October 1, 1993 Decided February 18, 1994
 sent. Id. at 10,500.
 !!L Co'_ches_o_,' No, 92-1168
 For the foregoing reasons, the petitions for review are
 Denied. ALLIANCE FOR CANNABIS THERAPEUTICS.
 PETITIONER
 V_
 _')RUG ENFORCEMENT ADMIN[STRAT:ON,
 _ESPONDENT
 PHYSICiMqS ASSOCIA'r'ION FO_{ AIDS CARE AND THE
 [.,Y_',PHO_,'t_. Feul.q[.wrIoN OF A_;'IER_CA.
 INTERVENORS
 Biils of costs must be filed withbt 1.4 days after entry of judgment
 The court looks with disfavor upon motions to file bills of costs out
 of time.




Previous , Next , Return to Index