norml03 - Page 1



Page 1 Previous , Next , Original Image
Return to Index


 12 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in
 the Federal ReportEr or U.S.App. D.C. Reports. Users are requested to
 [w]ith one exception, none of [these doctors] could idenfi- notify the Clerk of any formal errors in order that corrections may be made
 fy under oath the scientific studies they swore they relied before the bound volumes go to press.
 on. Only one had enough knowledge to discuss the
 scientific technicalities involved. Eventually, each one
 admitted he was basing his opinion on anecdotal evil-  , nittb  tatt  Caurt aŁ  ppeai 
 dence, on stories he heard from patients, and on his
 impressions about the drug. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
 Final Order, 57 Fed. Reg. at 10,502.4)3. These findings are
 consistent with the view that only rigorous scientific proof can
 satisfy the CSA's "currently accepted medical use" require- Argued October 1, 1993 Decided February 18, 1994
 anent. Id. at 10,500.
 III. CONCLUSION NO. 92-1168
 For the foregoing reasons, the petitions for review are
 Denied. ALLL_NCE FOR CANNABIS THERAPEUTICS,
 PETITIONER
 V,
 DRUG ENFORCEMENT 2_DMINISTRATION,
 RESPONDENT
 PHYSICIANS ASSOC_AT_O_ FOR AIDS CARE AND THE
 LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA,
 [NTERVENORS
 Bills of costa must be filed _qt.hin 14 days after entry of judgment.
 The court looks _qth disNvor upon motions to file bills of costs out
 of time.




Previous , Next , Return to Index