norml03 - Page 1
Page 1
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
12 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in
the Federal ReportEr or U.S.App. D.C. Reports. Users are requested to
[w]ith one exception, none of [these doctors] could idenfi- notify the Clerk of any formal errors in order that corrections may be made
fy under oath the scientific studies they swore they relied before the bound volumes go to press.
on. Only one had enough knowledge to discuss the
scientific technicalities involved. Eventually, each one
admitted he was basing his opinion on anecdotal evil- , nittb tatt Caurt aŁ ppeai
dence, on stories he heard from patients, and on his
impressions about the drug. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Final Order, 57 Fed. Reg. at 10,502.4)3. These findings are
consistent with the view that only rigorous scientific proof can
satisfy the CSA's "currently accepted medical use" require- Argued October 1, 1993 Decided February 18, 1994
anent. Id. at 10,500.
III. CONCLUSION NO. 92-1168
For the foregoing reasons, the petitions for review are
Denied. ALLL_NCE FOR CANNABIS THERAPEUTICS,
PETITIONER
V,
DRUG ENFORCEMENT 2_DMINISTRATION,
RESPONDENT
PHYSICIANS ASSOC_AT_O_ FOR AIDS CARE AND THE
LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA,
[NTERVENORS
Bills of costa must be filed _qt.hin 14 days after entry of judgment.
The court looks _qth disNvor upon motions to file bills of costs out
of time.
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index