norml02 - Page 26
Page 26
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
l
require a past history of use in treatment to show safety and
effectiveness. Final Order ii_ 57 Fed. Reg. at i0_506. The
Administrator has also clarified that recognition of the drug's
clinical use in generally accepted texts is not a distinct
requirement in his analysis° Id.
in the interest of clarity and brevity_ the Administrator has
subsumed former factor 7 and the part of factor 8 concerning
"recognition of the substance by a substantial segment of the
medical practitioners" into the requirement that a consensus of
qualified experts accept the drug for medical use. I d. at
I 10,505. This requirement applies only to drugs_ such as
I marijuanas with no approved NDA. A drug with an approved NDA
would already have been evaluated by _
_xper_s for safety and
I See 21 U.S.Co 355(d) (1988). The
effectiveness.
Administrator
has also determined that the drugCs recognition in generally
accepted texts is sufficient evidence ore but not prerequisite
I to, scientific knowledge of the drug's chemistry° Final Order
If, 57 Fed° Reg. at 10,506. When expert consensus is required_
I however_ the Administrator has determined that information about
the substance "must be reported, pub!ished_ or otherwise widely
available, in sufficient detail to permit experts to fairly
1 conclude the substance is safe and effect_ve for use in treating
a specifics recognized disorder. _ Id. (citing _Qoper
Laboratories Inc. v. FDA_ 501 F.2d 772{ 786 (D.C. Cir° 1974) °
The record supports the Administrator's conclusion that Final
Order I did not rely on the impermissible factors°
_0
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index