norml02 - Page 23
Page 23
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
As the Administrator points out, in the original Controlled
Substances Act schedules_ Congress appears to have placed all
NDA-approved drugs into Schedules !I-V and all drugs approved for
"investigationai use" only, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 355(i) (1988),
into Schedule I. The safety and effectiveness of the latter
drugs had not yet been determined. E d. at i0_504. It also
appears that Congress placed GRASE drugs into Schedules II-V.
Id. at 10,503 - 10,504. 7 Congress also placed drugs marketed
for particular uses since the original enactment of the FDCA in
1906 into Schedules II-Vo These so-called "grandfathered" drugs
had been excepted from the safety requirements of the 1938
version of the FDCA and from the effectiveness requirements of
the 1962 amendments. I do at i0,504. Et is true that FDCA
approval for interstate marketing is not a necessary prerequisite
to placement in Schedules II-V. See NORML v. DEA, 559 F.2d at
750 n°65 ("[There is] no reason to suppose that Congress intended
that the NDA institutional check necessarily precede the CSA
check.") Nevertheless, the FDCA standards for evaluating
evidence of effectiveness necessarily consider the medical use
context. It is therefore reasonable for the Administrator to
rely on those standards when evaluating evidence to determine if
a drug has an accepted medical use under the Controlled
Substances Act°
z In theory, Schedule ! could contain drugs that would
qualify as GRASE drugs° This is because _=he FDA does not
normally determine GRASE status unless a party .so requests. Such
a request usually occurs either in anticipation of marketing a
product or after a drug has been seized from interstate co_merceo
!7
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index