norml01 - Page 21
Page 21
Previous ,
Next ,
Original Image
Return to Index
|
I reschedule marijuana, and, ironically, Respondent's attempt to
i defend that decision only reiterates its unfairness.
C_ONCLUSION
|
For the foregoing reasons and for the reasons stated in
i Petitioners' Brief and in Intervenors _ Briefs this Court should
i remand the petition to DEA with instructions to (i) apply a legal
standard that does not give controlling weight to FDA-prescribed
I requirements for interstate marketing approval; (2) reopen the
record to allow Petitioners and Intervenors to submit additional
t evidence; and (3) review the record evidence with the objectivity
i and impartiality appropriate to agency action.
Respectfully submitted_
Kevin B. Zees_ t X° Da_idson
Arnold So Trebach Amy Wo Lustig
Jonathan Lee Kurry Sara E. Hauptfuehrer
t THE DRUG POLICY FOUNDATION
STEPTOE_
&
JOHNSON
4455 Connecticut Avenue_ N.Wo 1330 Connecticut Avenue_ N.W.
Washington_ D.Co 20008 Washinqton, D.C. 20036
i (202) 537-5005 (202) 429-3000
Attorneys for Petitioners Attorneys for Petitioner
I The Drug Policy Foundation and Alliance for Cannabis
National Organization for the Therapeutics and Intervenors
Reform of Marijuana Laws Physicians Association for
l AIDS Care and
Lymphoma Foundation of
America
D July I, 1993
|
|
I - 16 _
Previous ,
Next ,
Return to Index